Media Myths: Infertility and Impotence

If It's A Girl, She Will Be Queen

Fabiola Mother This Summer!

Next in the Media Myths series is the cruel claim that Fabiola was infertile. This issue impacted the couple in deeply profound ways, as one can imagine. It seems especially grievous that the trauma of their medical challenges were exploited to sell tabloid copy. The inferred image is of an infertile woman and an impotent man. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Infertility is the inability to achieve pregnancy. Being pregnant five times, should have quieted malicious whispers of infertility or any notion of the King lacking virility.

Covering this information illustrates vividly the sad axiom, the more things change, the more they stay the same. Both Fabiola and Baudouin exhibited inspirational courage of spirit, facing the public always with a smiling face and head held high. Reports are that each time her pregnancy was announced, the palace overflowed with the abundant generosity of the Belgian people, rejoicing at the special news of their King and Queen. Each time, a brief quiet announcement would pierce their joy.

Unscrupulous authors lazily cling to tired court rumours, one claiming Baudouin’s step-mother, Lilian Baels, received a letter reporting Fabiola never menstruated and was, thus, infertile. While laughable, the depths to which man will go for notoriety is immeasurable and certain writers and journalists have sold such nonsense to readership eager for a juicy detail. Earlier untruths cast Lilian as the apple of Baudouin’s adoring eye, being hopelessly in love with his step-mother. The proof is nowhere to be found in that pudding; Leopold and Lilian were as ignorant to Baudouin and Fabiola’s engagement as were all Belgian citizens.

The business of outsiders blaming Fabiola for the couple’s childlessness is cruel and unconscionable. I wonder at how it is journalists or palace “insiders” feel confident or even suitably emboldened to testify with authority to the queen’s personal medical details. Fabiola’s affirmation of suffering from miscarriages was widely reported by the Belgian press in 2008. Belgians, nevertheless, were surprised at learning Baudouin and Fabiola suffered the loss of five babies.

I certainly don’t know anything more about the details than what Fabiola said in 2008. I do know that often a spontaneous abortion/miscarriage is triggered as the body’s fail-safe way of stopping a non-viable baby. Most often, this is manifested due to chromosomal insufficiency or abnormalities. The baby receives chromosome material and markers from both parents. This is how diseases get passed down from generation to generation.

It was scarcely reported, but King Baudouin suffered from Barlow Syndrome. His physical characteristics are classic for Barlow. Tall, extremely slender, elongated features, requiring corrective lenses for sight… Another system impacted is the skeletal system. As people age, material around the skeleton deteriorates and leads to back pain. Baudouin suffered severe back-pain later in life that he attributed to his golfing passion as a young man.

One of the most serious complications of Barlow Syndrome is mitral valve prolapse, from which Baudouin suffered. Surgery was performed on him in 1990 in an attempt to fix the valve. Until the last 20 years or so, this often meant a patient’s life span could be cut by a quarter or even a third. There is an increase frequency of sudden cardiac failure in Barlow patients with valve problems – even if they’ve been successfully operated on.

Heart ailments were fairly common in the King’s family. Indeed, his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth, died of heart failure. His father, Leopold III, died of a heart attack. His brother, Alexander, required heart surgery to correct a defect during his youth.

All of this makes me wonder if each time Fabiola conceived there wasn’t a chromosomal abnormality that triggered a miscarriage? It is exceedingly rare that a woman who has multiple miscarriages (3 or more) continues to have miscarriages. Statistically, after a miscarriage a woman has about a 65% chance of carrying the next baby to term. And yet Fabiola had miscarriage after miscarriage after miscarriage. She was checked by renowned Swiss doctors, so one might infer that she did not have a physical abnormality, which would have been seen and diagnosed by those physicians.

La Reina Fabiola ha visto frustradas nuevamente sus esperanzas de maternidad

The Sad News – click for rough translation

That leaves us back at chromosomal abnormality possibly being in play – in this case, each time you’re still working from affected genetic material which could possibly encode the child’s chromosomes incorrectly – thus triggering another miscarriage.

I thus present to the unscrupulous journalists and anonymous insiders this: Wouldn’t it be interesting to find out that perhaps a miscarriage was triggered by chromosomal biologic material incompatible with viable life? Now wouldn’t that just be interesting? Not an issue of everyone supposedly knowing whether Fabiola menstruates or not. Not an issue of Fabiola being guilty of knowing she had infertility and needing to sacrifice her marriage to go to a convent releasing Baudouin to marry again in order to gain an heir. Not an issue of Fabiola being “barren”. Not even an issue of any kind dealing with Fabiola.

It is not for us to know. In the end, the lasting lesson in this tragedy was the indomitable spirit of these two inspirational souls who lived as one. King Baudouin and Queen Fabiola bore their cross with grace and turned this adversity to triumph by welcoming all the children of Belgium into their hearts. I will follow up on that point in an upcoming post.

Let us find encouragement in the story of loss and hope from these two guiding lights.

Bonus Material: Coming soon.

 

Media Myths Series: The Monk-King

B98In this first post for my Media Myths Series covering media bias and fabrications, I will focus on some obvious mistaken or misleading information produced by Belgian and European media based on un-named “insiders” who claim intimate knowledge of the King. This one deals with the claim that Baudouin wanted to abdicate in favor of a monastic life.

It is quite obvious, based on his life and photo evidence that he absolutely did not want the secluded life of a religious. He wanted a wife – a traditional wife and a traditional life. He was already miserably secluded in the Palace at Laeken and hated being so. His dreadful unhappiness shown on his face and through the pain in his eyes. Indeed, his spiritual mentor, Cardinal Léon Joseph Suenens, who after Baudouin’s untimely death wrote a book on the King’s inspiring faith, never mentions anything about the King wanting the solitary life of a religious. Cardinal Suenens and Baudouin discussed his painful isolation in Laeken Palace and his desire to find a spouse. After meeting innumerable European princesses and finding no connection with them, Baudouin asks the Cardinal to assist in a search for a suitable Roman Catholic young lady of great spiritual depth and faith to match his own.

Therefore, by this evidence, there is no logic or proof in the media’s assertion that Baudouin wanted to live a monastic life.

Don’t Depend on the Media for Accuracy

I have found one can NEVER depend on the media to get information correct. Lack of critical thinking in particular adds to the dissonance, especially if the “proof” of a statement is being supported by regular media. The veracity of journalism and published biographies can be lacking at times.

Here’s an example I came across on YouTube:

Cooking show Plat Préféré (in Dutch)

Quote from the description of the Plat Préféré show:
>>Eén van die suggesties was gigue de chevreuil au sauce poivrade – reebout met pepersaus – de absolute favoriet van de koning. Het liefst schoot hij de ree zelf, want Boudewijn was een fervent en vooral goed jager.<<

That is saying that venison in peppercorn sauce was King Baudouin’s favorite meal and particularly if he shot the deer himself as he was a ‘fervent and very good hunter‘.

This is rubbish!  There are no pictures of him with any gun in his hand. There has been no article or book I’ve found that refers to him hunting, except to say he greatly disliked hunters and didn’t like the organized riding hunts but went about one or two years at the beginning of his reign afterward promptly stopping.

If someone didn’t use basic research skills, that information seems okay, but is completely incorrect. When I came across that on YouTube, I first commented that I learned something new. But, then I didn’t think it sounded quite right. After a bit of research, I went back and posted that he was completely incorrect based on 1) my general knowledge of the person in question and, 2) this article from HUMO:

Plat Prefere Koning Boudewijn – HUMO Article

>>Jan van den Berghe (fronst de wenkbrauwen, schudt het hoofd en krabt de kruin) «Ik weet niet waar Jeroen Meus zijn informatie gehaald heeft, maar het zou me niet verbazen als het uit hetzelfde kookboek was waaruit hij eerder al de favoriete maaltijd van Adolf Hitler wist op te diepen.<<

In English:
Jan van den Berghe: “I do not know where Jeroen Meus has taken his information, but it would not surprise me if it was from the same cookbook (in) which he already (found) the favorite meal of Adolf Hitler…

New readers of the subject may never think to do a quick verification search, and then they’d believe to be true something completely incorrect. In fact, the one who was the deer hunter was, in fact, Baudouin’s step-mother, Princess Lilian de Rethy.

Wearing her favorite brooch given by Leopold III
The stag-head diamond and citrine brooch
With her deer rifle
On a hunting outing
Hunting season
Feeding deer on her property

So, even if there’s an article or a book, it doesn’t mean it’s correct. Keep your thinking caps on. If you are a subject area expert be true to your knowledge base/gut instincts.

King Baudouin – Champion for Life

I was convicted by the Lord to speak out on life issues after the 1) horrible Gosnell case became known; 2) 40th Anniversary of Legalized Abortion in the USA; 3) President Obama was a keynote speaker for Planned Parenthood. This trifecta of darkness disheartened me so much I felt I should see what I could do personally and what my church was doing. I feel especially close to the issue as so many millions of my Generation X were killed in this unspeakable wicked act; I could no longer remain silent.

In my dismay about where abortion has brought us, I stumbled across the story of King Baudouin I of Belgium, who I’m so sorry to say died in 1993 – way too early. In 1990 when Belgium was presented with a law legalizing abortion, Baudouin (an amazing Christian along with his wife, Fabiola) refused to give royal ascent by his signature. He even had to mount a campaign asking if it was just for the King to be the only Belgian not permitted to act in accordance with his conscience. A political maneuver was devised by the Prime Minister to declare the King unable to rule, have the governing body act in his stead to give ascent and then declare him again able to rule. An albeit awkward yet effective device, no doubt.

Even Belgians who were for the law respected his resolute adherence to his deep faith. Many people have incorrectly attributed his refusal to the tragedy of five miscarriages suffered by his wife which left them childless, but that is not the reason at all, although that is heartbreaking given the beautiful nature and faith of this couple. No, the reason for this was he absolutely believed that life is to be cherished from beginning to end and that each life has value.

euthanasia-2

Further Reading>>
Belgium Approves Measure Allowing Doctors to Euthanize Children 
Opinion: Belgium’s experience with euthanasia teaches bitter lessons or PDF

King Baudouin knew this implicitly. He had declared, “The child, because of his lack of physical and intellectual maturity, needs special protection, special care, especially legal protection before as well as after birth.” There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that King Baudouin would have been equally appalled by the notion of ending the gift of life through euthanasia, and the very notion of doing so to a living child would have been as unthinkable to him then as it should be to us today.

In the Evangelium vitæ n. 62 of Pope John Paul II, he writes, “No circumstance, no purpose, no law whatsoever can ever make licit an act which is intrinsically illicit, since it is contrary to the Law of God which is written in every human heart, knowable by reason itself, and proclaimed by the Church.”

You know, the preeminent children’s hospital in Brussels is the Queen Fabiola Children’s University Hospital. What cruel twist of human failing would introduce the criminality of such an illicit act in an institution named for a devout outstanding Christian woman, one who lost five babies herself.

Sadly, the new monarch, King Philippe, so close to his uncle Baudouin and partially raised by Baudouin and Fabiola, had an outstanding opportunity to reflect the same brave dedication to faith shown by his uncle by refusing to provide royal ascent to the child euthanasia law, but did not act in kind. It would have been dramatic bookends, bracketing just how far down the path we’ve strayed from a basic respect for human life.

King Baudouin was a champion of life and still inspires us today to reach out in faith and love for the dignity and value of each life.

euthanasia-1